The sudden and violent death of the American activist Charlie Kirk, who rallied a youth movement and held celebrity status among his fans, has sparked fierce debate over his political legacy.
The 31-year-old's young supporters appreciated his conservative Christian values and frank opinions. Speaking to the BBC, many were in tears as they remembered a man who listened to them and understood their concerns.
His views were polarising on the college campuses where he held large events, and his provocative speeches would draw crowds of vocal opponents as well as fans.
Kirk was a strong supporter of gun rights, vehemently opposed abortion, was critical of transgender rights and promoted false claims about Covid-19. He wasn't shy when it came to expressing his views - and his detractors also didn't hold back.
Encouraging and taking part in fierce, open debates was central to both his professional success and his personal worldview. When people stop talking, that's when you get violence, Kirk once stated in a video.
Now, both supporters and opponents have been left shaken after he was killed by a single shot on stage while debating at a university in Utah.
Left-wing influencer Dean Withers commented on the incident, expressing his sadness and denouncing gun violence.
As tributes poured in, many pushed back against comments suggesting Kirk deserved to be shot due to his stance on gun rights.
With the immediate shock of his death, discussions have also shifted to the enduring impact of Kirk as a political figure. While critics condemned his views, supporters noted that he inspired many young people to engage in political discourse.
Julia Pierce emphasized that Kirk would be remembered for empowering young conservatives to embrace their beliefs. Similarly, activist Chandler Crump reflected on the sense of community Kirk fostered by treating young people as equals in debate.
Kirk's outspoken stances on LGBTQ+ issues drew severe criticism, signaling the divisive nature of his legacy.
As conversations continue, many young people stress that violence in politics is never justified, marking a crucial moment in discussions around freedom of speech and civil discourse.
