The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is set to deliver an advisory opinion on Israel's legal obligations concerning UN agencies and international organizations operating in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip.
The request for this opinion arose from a resolution passed by the UN General Assembly, particularly following Israel's parliament's laws that prohibit activities of the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (Unrwa) on Israeli territory. Israel has accused Unrwa of being infiltrated by Hamas, a claim which the agency has vehemently denied, asserting its impartiality in the region.
The ICJ has been tasked with clarifying Israel's duty not only to respect the independence of UN agencies but also to facilitate the unhindered delivery of essential supplies to Palestinians—a pressing demand as the humanitarian situation in Gaza continues to deteriorate under strict Israeli blockades.
In light of the Israeli blockade established following its conflict with Hamas two years prior, the entry of food and humanitarian aid has been critically restricted. Prior to a recent ceasefire agreement, more than 640,000 individuals were reportedly facing catastrophic levels of food insecurity in Gaza, prompting international experts to comment on an “entirely man-made” famine affecting the region. Israel has dismissed these claims, arguing it provides sufficient food aid and accusing Hamas of diverting resources.
The UN's deliberations at The Hague bring to light two significant questions: are Israel's restrictions on Unrwa contrary to UN conventions? And does Israel's control over aid crossings into Gaza violate international humanitarian law? Though the opinions rendered by the ICJ are non-binding, they hold considerable moral and diplomatic weight on the international stage.
Israel has criticized the legal proceedings as a misapplication of international law, highlighting its right to self-defense and the need to protect its citizens from threats posed by Hamas. Furthermore, the legitimacy of UN interventions faces scrutiny as several Israeli laws obstruct Unrwa's operations, compelling the organization to challenge the legalities surrounding its presence and its commitment to aid in the region.
This inquiry marks a pivotal moment, not only for Unrwa but also for the broader question of the international community's ability to enforce its regulations and provide humanitarian assistance in the face of opposition from major UN member states.
}
