Prince Laurent, the younger brother of King Philippe, faced disappointment in his quest for social security benefits, which he claimed were justified due to his work as a royal and his involvement in animal welfare. His argument centered on the principle of entitlement to social benefits available to all residents, regardless of wealth. Despite receiving a significant allowance, which largely goes toward support staff and other expenses, Laurent expressed concerns about his family’s future financial stability.
In a recent court hearing in Brussels, judges dismissed Laurent's claims, emphasizing that he does not qualify under current laws as either self-employed or employed, and thus, does not have a right to social security benefits. Nonetheless, the court acknowledged existing gaps in legislation that prevent royal figures from accessing such benefits, suggesting the need for legal reforms.
Laurent, who has occasionally stirred controversy with his actions, including attending events without official permission, has not immediately decided whether to appeal the court’s decision. His legal counsel insists the case reflects a broader issue regarding social security rights in Belgium.
In a recent court hearing in Brussels, judges dismissed Laurent's claims, emphasizing that he does not qualify under current laws as either self-employed or employed, and thus, does not have a right to social security benefits. Nonetheless, the court acknowledged existing gaps in legislation that prevent royal figures from accessing such benefits, suggesting the need for legal reforms.
Laurent, who has occasionally stirred controversy with his actions, including attending events without official permission, has not immediately decided whether to appeal the court’s decision. His legal counsel insists the case reflects a broader issue regarding social security rights in Belgium.
