Skip to main content
DeepRoots Network
PoliticsUnited Kingdom

Prince Harry Settles Case with Murdoch's News Group Over Hacking Claims

Prince Harry reaches a settlement with Rupert Murdoch's tabloids, receiving an apology and damages for past unlawful intrusions.

By Mark LandlerSource: nytimes.com1 min read
Prince Harry Settles Case with Murdoch's News Group Over Hacking Claims
Image via nytimes.com

In brief

In a surprising turn, Prince Harry has settled his case against Rupert Murdoch’s News Group Newspapers over allegations of hacking and privacy invasions, receiving a significant apology and damages.

In a moment of unexpected resolution, Prince Harry has successfully reached a last-minute settlement with Rupert Murdoch’s News Group Newspapers concerning serious allegations of unlawful information gathering. Announced on Wednesday, this settlement marks an anticlimactic yet significant closure to a case that Harry viewed as a crucial opportunity to hold tabloids accountable for longstanding intrusive behaviors. The settlement includes a "full and unequivocal" apology from News Group Newspapers for hacking into Harry’s cellphone and for other unlawful intrusions into his personal life. Notably, the apology extends to past intrusions involving his late mother, Diana, Princess of Wales, who tragically died in a car accident while being pursued by photographers in 1997.In the apology statement, the company recognized the distress caused to the Duke of Sussex and acknowledged the damage done to his personal relationships. Alongside the apology, a substantial financial compensation was agreed upon, marking a significant acknowledgment of the harm inflicted upon Harry and his family.This settlement comes just a day before a highly anticipated trial was set to commence and spares News Group Newspapers from the ramifications of a potentially damaging trial involving past phone hacking practices. The agreement also alleviates the financial burden Harry could have faced under English law, where he would have been responsible for both sides' legal costs had he not received an equivalent or greater amount from the court ruling.The quick resolution of this case highlights the ongoing concerns surrounding media ethics and privacy rights, especially concerning public figures and their families. As the story continues to unfold, further updates are expected, shedding light on the implications of this significant settlement in the realm of media accountability and personal privacy.

Topics

More on this story