In brief
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was created in 2018 to safeguard U.S. election systems, but recent staff reductions and budget constraints have diminished its effectiveness. With critical midterm elections approaching, state officials are unsure of CISA's involvement. Many states reported a lack of federal assistance in the recent elections, heightening concerns about the security infrastructure that CISA has traditionally provided.
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — Since its establishment in 2018, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has played a vital role in advising state and local election officials on potential threats from foreign governments, and has worked on securing polling places from attacks. However, with shifting priorities and decreased funding under the Trump administration, many state officials are concerned about CISA's future support as midterm elections approach in 2026.
Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon remarked that there is uncertainty about relying on CISA's services during an important electoral year. Some state leaders are already making plans to fill gaps in election security ahead of the upcoming elections.
In response to worries regarding CISA’s diminished capacity, an official letter was sent to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in February, advocating for the preservation of essential election security functions. Unfortunately, Noem has yet to respond.
The Agency's Transitional Phase
CISA, initially founded to protect critical infrastructure, including election systems, has undergone significant changes since the beginning of the Trump administration. Reports indicate a significant reduction in workforce, with approximately 1,000 employees laid off. The agency has experienced cuts to funding for cybersecurity initiatives specifically related to aiding state and local election officials, leading to a diminished role in the latest elections.
Without a confirmed director and with ongoing transformations, CISA's ability to support election security has significantly decreased. CISA representatives declined to elaborate on the agency’s role during the recent elections or staffing changes.
States Left to Their Own Devices
State officials have expressed disappointment at the lack of assistance from CISA during recent local elections. For instance, California's election security agencies indicated that while CISA had previously been instrumental, their support was minimal for the state's recent congressional redistricting vote. Several state secretaries have confirmed that they relied more heavily on local resources without significant federal input, raising concerns about effective election security.
Simon noted the critical need for clarity on CISA's support, as officials prepare to identify alternative resources for election security services. Some essential federal support, like intelligence briefings, is irreplaceable, but for other services, states will be seeking additional options. Simon concluded the need for further guidance and support from CISA cannot be overstated as future elections loom nearer.
