LOS ANGELES (AP) — Officials in Los Angeles County are poised to vote on a significant measure aimed at addressing the financial distress experienced by residents in the wake of ongoing federal immigration raids. The proposal is to declare a state of emergency, which would empower the county to offer rent relief and other supportive services to those affected.

The LA County Board of Supervisors is expected to discuss the ramifications of federal immigration enforcement that has been creating fear and instability for many families. Supervisor Lindsey Horvath has emphasized that these immigration actions have disrupted lives, suggesting that the emergency declaration would be a way to push back against these federal initiatives.

The emergency declaration could trigger the allocation of state funds for rent assistance to individuals who find themselves unable to meet payment obligations due to the impacts of the raids. Applications for assistance would be managed through an online portal expected to launch within two months.

Critics, including some landlords, worry that such measures may lead to another wave of financial distress after having endured the consequences of eviction moratoriums during the COVID-19 pandemic. There are concerns that deferring rent payments due to immigration raids could further exacerbate the local housing crisis. Daniel Yukelson, CEO of the Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles, expressed unease about the potential economic fallout from these measures, noting that many landlords are already recovering from significant financial losses during the pandemic.

Since the summer, the Los Angeles region has become a focal point of a controversial immigration strategy under the previous administration. Federal enforcement officials have conducted raids in various public spaces, prompting protests and community unrest. Horvath and fellow Supervisor Janice Hahn have strongly criticized these raids, calling them destructive to community stability.

The voting occurs amid a backdrop of rising tension around immigration policy and local governance, where the impacts of federal policy continue to reverberate through local communities. The board's decision could set a precedent for how local governments respond to federal immigration enforcement actions in the future.