In a significant ruling, a US judge has determined that grand jury materials pertaining to Ghislaine Maxwell's sex-trafficking case will remain sealed. Judge Paul Engelmayer's decision emphasizes the importance of safeguarding the confidentiality of grand jury proceedings, asserting that publicizing the documents would not yield any critical new information.

The justice department had petitioned to unseal the materials, hoping to quell mounting frustrations among supporters of former President Donald Trump regarding the unreleased federal files related to Jeffrey Epstein, Maxwell’s deceased associate and convicted sex offender. Maxwell, currently serving a 20-year sentence for her involvement in Epstein's crimes, opposed the release of these documents.

Judge Engelmayer articulated that unsealing the materials would compromise the grand jury system's integrity, expanding the risks of discouraging potential witnesses and jurors who need assurance in the confidentiality of their testimony. He pointed out that the argument for unsealing, suggesting that much of the grand jury information had already been disclosed during Maxwell’s trial, did not hold enough weight. While he noted that individuals familiar with the trial records would learn little new from the grand jury documents, he affirmed that the materials themselves did not implicate any other possible offenders.

Maxwell, now 63, was convicted in December 2019 for her roles related to Epstein and recently transitioned from a prison in Florida to a minimum-security facility in Texas. Earlier this week, one of her accusers publicly declared that Maxwell should remain incarcerated for the entirety of her life.

The BBC has reached out to Maxwell’s legal team for further comments regarding the recent ruling. Additionally, an ongoing investigation, highlighted by a congressional subpoena to the justice department, seeks clarity on the many allegations concerning Epstein and Maxwell, which have persisted for more than two decades. Meanwhile, Trump has faced pressure from constituents demanding answers related to the Epstein dossier, despite maintaining that he was previously unaware of Epstein's criminal activities.