The secondhand book market is experiencing a surge, yet the sudden influx of large orders from mystery buyers has raised alarm among independent booksellers. Across the globe, vendors have received bulk shipments that exceed their usual weekly sales, often destined for warehouses outside the local community.
The spike aligns with a 2025 court ruling that cleared AI technology companies to use purchased books for training software under the claim of "exceedingly transformative" use. The ruling drew a sharp line between U.S. copyright law and the intense need for new information by intelligent systems.
High-profile documents from the Anthropic case revealed the scope of a project called “Project Panama,” described as a goal to “destructively scan all the books in the world.” The process involves shipping books to specialized facilities where the spines are removed to enable rapid digitalization, with the remaining covers then recycled. The name may be new, but the destructive intent carries a long history of cultural loss.
Booksellers such as Stuart Manley of Barter Books in Northumberland note that while sales help circulate titles, the unknown destinations spark uneasy ethics. “It would be a pity to see books that carried stories for future generations destroyed under the guise of technology,” he says.
The stakes are especially high for indigenous communities, whose histories are often preserved in hand‑written manuscripts, oral histories transcribed into printed form, and rare texts that may exist only in a handful of copies. Destructive scanning carries the inherent risk of erasing fragile cultural memory and diminishing the capacity for self‑representation in a digital age.
Both legal scholars and critics urge stricter safeguards in the AI domain, noting that British law, for example, requires explicit permission from copyright owners to enable training. Yet the ethics of automated consumption of books remain contested: should AI development continue to override the cultural value embedded in each copy?
In the end, this controversy is about more than volume. It asks whether a generation that relies on generative AI can also value the deep roots held within the pages of long‑forgotten books. Calming the tide of destruction may require new partnerships, server‑friendly license agreements, and a strong emphasis on preserving cultural heritage for future generations. This is the issue booksellers, technologists, and indigenous groups must confront together.
