Amid the escalating tensions in the Middle East, Israeli leaders have chosen a notably quiet stance regarding the U.S. military buildup against Iran. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has consistently labeled Iran as Israel's primary threat, has refrained from openly commenting on the U.S.'s escalating confrontations, focusing instead on supporting protests against the Iranian government. This silence, coupled with observed internal strategies, signals a calculated political move regarding Iran's fate as the region braces for potential military actions.

Analysts have noted that Netanyahu's reticence reflects a broader strategy that anticipates significant American military action against Iran. Senior experts suggest that while Netanyahu remains focused on Iran's nuclear capabilities and its regional militia threats, he may be leveraging the historical moment, viewing it as a golden opportunity for regime change facilitated by U.S. military might. This approach underscores a desire for the U.S. to lead any actions against Iran, allowing Israel to benefit from the strategic effects without taking on the burden of direct military engagement.

In Tel Aviv, public sentiment appears mixed. Many see this moment as one that presents an opportunity for substantive change in Iran, particularly at a time when the regime is perceived as weakened from both internal protests and external pressures. Yet, others caution about the unpredictability of regime change, expressing concerns over who would replace the current government and subsequent regional stability. Israeli polls lift questions on the level of military action the public supports, as leaders grapple with the risks that any targeted strikes might provoke.

With the Trump administration contemplating various escalatory actions against Iran, ranging from limited strikes to full-scale regime change, Israeli analysts are closely watching how this plays out. Experts suggest that while many within Israel see hope in a destabilized Iran, the potential for a backlash resulting from military strikes could cause long-lasting ramifications for peace in the region.