Skip to main content
DeepRoots Network
PoliticsA U.S. Bankruptcy Court judge is set to explain the approval of Purdue Pharma's plan to settle thousands of lawsuits related to the opioid crisis, with the Sackler family agreeing to pay up to $7 billion and changes in ownership and company structure.

Purdue Pharma Settlement: Sackler Family to Pay $7 Billion Amidst Opioid Crisis

In a landmark decision, a U.S. Bankruptcy Court judge approved Purdue Pharma's settlement for thousands of opioid-related lawsuits, involving a substantial payment plan from the Sackler family aimed at addressing the ongoing crisis.

Source: AP2 min read
Purdue Pharma Settlement: Sackler Family to Pay $7 Billion Amidst Opioid Crisis
Image via AP

In brief

A U.S. Bankruptcy Court is set to approve a plan that will see Purdue Pharma and its owners, the Sackler family, pay a total of $7 billion to settle thousands of lawsuits related to the opioid epidemic. The funds will facilitate the creation of a new company, Knoa Pharma, focused on public welfare. A specific portion of this settlement is designated for individual victims, particularly those affected by opioid addiction. This legal resolution follows years of litigation and comes with commitments from the Sackler family to relinquish ownership and transparency in future operations.

A U.S. Bankruptcy Court judge is set to give his reasoning Tuesday for approving OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma’s plan to settle thousands of lawsuits over the toll of opioids.

The deal calls for members of the Sackler family who own the company to pay up to $7 billion over time.

Judge Sean Lane said last week that he would accept the plan, which ranks among the largest opioid settlements ever and would do something other major ones don’t: Pay some victims of the crisis.

Money will go to governments and some individuals

Sackler family members agreed to pay up to $7 billion over 15 years, providing most of the cash involved in the settlement.

The funds distributed to state, local and Native Americans is to be used mostly to address the opioid crisis, as has been the case with other opioid settlements.

About $850 million of that is to go to individual victims, including children born with opioid withdrawal.

People with addiction and survivors of those who died must prove they were prescribed OxyContin to participate. Those who do could receive payments of around $8,000 or around $16,000, depending on how long they received the drug and how many other people qualify. The money for individual victims is to be distributed next year.

Not only money is at stake

Members of the Sackler family are agreeing to give up ownership of Purdue.

For them, that won’t be a major change since no family member has served on Purdue’s board or received money from the company since 2018. The plan calls for Purdue to be replaced with a new company, Knoa Pharma, controlled by a board appointed by states and with a mission of benefiting the public.

Sackler family members will also agree to avoid putting their names on institutions in exchange for contributions—something they’ve done often in the past, despite many institutions cutting ties with them.

The company has also agreed to make public a trove of internal documents that could shed additional light into how the company promoted and monitored opioids.

One feature that won’t recur under this new deal that was in a previous one: forcing members of the Sackler family to hear directly from people harmed by OxyContin.

A long legal saga could be wrapping up

Purdue filed for bankruptcy protection in 2019 when it faced thousands of opioid-related lawsuits from state and local governments and others.

A judge approved a settlement two years later. But the U.S. Supreme Court later rejected that plan because it provided members of the Sackler family immunity from lawsuits over opioids even though they were not personally declaring bankruptcy.

The latest plan permits lawsuits against Sackler family members by those who don’t opt into the deal.

This time through, few parties objected to the settlement. However, individuals representing themselves, who were either addicted to opioids or had loved ones who were, raised concerns during a three-day confirmation hearing last week.

Topics

More on this story