Skip to main content
DeepRoots Network

Australia Hands Back Two Song‑Dynasty Limestone Heads to China

Australia returned two limestone statues from the Northern Song Dynasty to China’s National Cultural Heritage Administration in Canberra, underscoring a shared commitment to protect heritage items.

By DeepRoots NetworkSource: english.news.cn2 min read

In brief

Australian authorities handed over to China the head of a military statue and the head of a civil official statue dating back to the Northern Song Dynasty. Both relics, carved from limestone in Henan province, were returned following a joint memorandum in 2025 that aimed to recover displaced cultural heritage. The ceremony highlighted the mutual respect of both countries for cultural rights and their dedication to UNESCO heritage conventions.

In Canberra on October 28, Australia handed back two limestone heads that once stood in China’s Northern Song Dynasty (960‑1127) mausoleums to the country’s National Cultural Heritage Administration, a gesture described by both sides as a reflection of respect for shared heritage.

The first relic is the head of a military official from the Yongyu Mausoleum, while the second is the head of a civil official from the Yongchang Mausoleum. According to the National Gallery of Australia, the limestone pieces originated in central China’s Henan province and were removed from their original context during the mid‑20th century. Their return follows a formal agreement signed in 2025 that outlined the procedures for safely repatriating displaced cultural objects.

The handover ceremony, held at the National Gallery of Australia, was attended by Tang Wei, deputy director of the National Cultural Heritage Administration; Liu Jinsong, China’s ambassador to Australia; and Nick Mitzevich, director of the NGA. Although the officials spoke collectively, each emphasized the importance of safeguarding cultural heritage and fostering deeper ties between the two nations. The NGA chief explained that the return of the relics “represents more than the physical transfer of cultural objects” and that it “demonstrates a sense of responsibility and the importance of international partnerships.”

From the Chinese side, the officials highlighted the significance of returning displaced relics to their rightful nation of origin. They said that such actions are “an important step towards safeguarding cultural heritage, respecting the cultural rights and national sentiments of peoples around the world, and protecting the achievements of human civilization.” The ceremony was therefore seen as a tangible outcome of the China‑Australia cooperation in implementing international conventions such as UNESCO’s 1970 Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property.

Australia’s language around the ceremony focused on the broader implications for bilateral relations. Speakers argued that the return “would strengthen Australia‑China ties and encourage continued cooperation in cultural heritage protection.” They further noted that the cooperation “would help promote people‑to‑people exchanges and empathy between the two peoples,” framing it as a cultural bridge beyond a single event.

The repatriation is part of an ongoing effort by China’s National Cultural Heritage Administration to reclaim objects that have been held abroad for decades. The 2025 memorandum that led to the return of the limestone heads was signed after the NGA received supporting evidence and a formal request from the National Cultural Heritage Administration. This cooperation illustrates the mechanisms that can be employed by countries to restore cultural treasures to their communities when they have been removed, intentionally or otherwise, from their place of origin.

Looking ahead, the two governments have expressed a desire to expand such exchanges and to develop collaborative projects around the protection of cultural heritage. The return of the Song‑Dynasty heads is likely to set a precedent for future repatriations, providing a model for the role that modern museums and cultural agencies can play in preserving the intangible sense of identity and history that such artifacts embody for their communities.

Topics

More on this story