The US Supreme Court has announced it will review state laws that bar transgender athletes from competing in women’s and girls’ sports, a significant legal battle emerging from Idaho and West Virginia. The case stems from successful injunctions obtained by two transgender students, allowing them to participate in sports while the legality of these bans is assessed. The potential ruling from the Supreme Court could bear considerable consequences for countless states that have enacted similar bans.

Just weeks prior, the conservative-majority court upheld a Tennessee law prohibiting gender transition care for minors, a ruling advocates regard as detrimental to transgender rights nationwide. The Supreme Court’s review will focus on cases involving 15-year-old Becky Pepper-Jackson and 24-year-old Lindsay Hecox, who initially challenged the discriminatory state bans in West Virginia and Idaho, arguing they violate constitutional rights.

Idaho’s legislation was the pioneering ban against transgender athletes, with 24 other states quickly following suit. Hecox, a long-distance runner, initiated her legal fight in 2020 shortly after the law came into effect and received favorable rulings from both district and appellate courts. Proponents of the ban, including Idaho state lawmaker Barbara Ehardt, argue that these measures ensure fairness by preventing male athletes from competing against females in sports.

Nevertheless, an appellate panel ruled that Idaho's law violated constitutional rights, emphasizing the state’s failure to substantiate claims that the prohibition protects sex equality and opportunities for female athletes. West Virginia Attorney General John McCuskey expressed support for the court’s review, asserting that the state enacted its ban to uphold fairness in women’s sports.

Advocates for transgender rights, such as Joshua Block from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), argue that the lower courts made correct decisions in blocking what they deem discriminatory measures. He highlighted that excluding transgender youth from school sports creates an unsafe and hostile learning environment for all students.

The Supreme Court is expected to deliberate on these cases during its upcoming term, which starts in October, and while the hearing dates are yet to be determined, the decision could set a pivotal precedent affecting states with similar bans on transgender athletes.