Judicial Decision Expected on SNAP Crisis Amid Government Shutdown

Sat Nov 01 2025 02:08:09 GMT+0200 (Eastern European Standard Time)

As two federal judges contemplate requests to safeguard upcoming SNAP food aid benefits during an ongoing government shutdown, an estimated 41 million Americans face uncertainty over their grocery purchases for November.

A ruling from U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani could determine whether SNAP food aid will continue during a government shutdown, affecting millions dependent on the program. The ruling comes as government officials say they cannot legally use available funds to maintain SNAP amid budget constraints, potentially forcing families to scramble for food resources.

BOSTON (AP) — A potential judicial decision looms as two federal judges consider whether to require the Trump administration to restore SNAP food aid benefits for November during the ongoing government shutdown. This ruling could significantly affect grocery access for about one in eight Americans.

Despite the legal pushback, many beneficiaries may still experience delays receiving the reloads for their grocery debit cards, which can take one to two weeks. Thus, it is likely too late for funds to be loaded at the beginning of November.

During court proceedings in Boston, Judge Indira Talwani expressed doubt about the government’s argument against maintaining benefits. If the government cannot afford to cover the costs, there is an equitable process necessary rather than halting all benefits, she stated, emphasizing what she interpreted as Congress's intent for emergencies like this.

Talwani hinted that the government should tap into emergency funds to sustain SNAP. If you don’t have money, you tighten your belt. You are not going to make everyone drop dead because it’s a political game someplace, she remarked in a compelling court address.

Government lawyers countered that a contingency fund, which contains approximately $5 billion, cannot legally support SNAP due to the program's monthly cost of around $8 billion. However, states argue this fund should be utilized to help the most vulnerable.

In an unprecedented move, Talwani indicated her ruling could apply nationwide rather than just in the states involved in this legal challenge, potentially conflicting with U.S. Supreme Court limitations on nationwide injunctions.

A second hearing on a similar suit, filed by various cities and nonprofit organizations, is scheduled which may also lead to further legal discussions. The outcome of these cases will likely be contested, as food banks and communities brace for a significant shift in how low-income individuals obtain groceries.

As the situation develops, advocates worry this food aid disruption would force families to choose between buying food or paying other essential bills. Proposals to sustain SNAP benefits during the shutdown have thus far been unsuccessful in Congress, increasing the sense of urgency among communities reliant on this support as the November benefits deadline approaches.