Israel’s Supreme Court is pressing the government for clarity on why a comprehensive system for evacuating sick Gazans isn't in place. This legal action follows a petition by three Israeli human rights groups, sparked by the closing of the Rafah border in June, which halted patient transfers. Previously, about 50 patients a day could seek treatment abroad, a number that has since dwindled. Adi Lustigman, representing one of the petitioning groups, highlighted the chaos and inconsistency in evacuation approvals, where critically ill patients are often overlooked. The petition insists on a humane and transparent procedure, stopping short of demanding treatment in Israel but stressing the need for patients to access medical aid without hindrance. Security concerns and public opinion are viewed as potential reasons for the government's reluctance to establish such mechanisms.
Israeli Court Seeks Explanation on Medical Aid Gaps for Gazans
Israeli Court Seeks Explanation on Medical Aid Gaps for Gazans
Israeli human rights groups demand answers on evacuation delays for sick Gazans.
Israel’s Supreme Court has ordered an inquiry into the lack of a clear system for the evacuation of ill residents from Gaza for medical treatment abroad. This follows a petition from three Israeli human rights organizations, spurred by the shutdown of the Rafah border crossing with Egypt. Prior to the closure, about 50 patients were evacuated daily, but the process has nearly stopped, according to Adi Lustigman from Physician for Human Rights Israel. The petition seeks transparency and consistency in the evacuation process, emphasizing humanity and urging a rational approach to patient transfers, without demanding treatment within Israel itself. Public opinion may influence resistance to these efforts, suggesting deeper issues at play amidst ongoing conflict tensions.
